Written on 5:54 PM by CommuniKation
SECURITY INDUSTRY AUTHORITY
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
Q & A - General
Q. Why did the SIA chose Hampshire and the IOW to run the pilot / start up?
A. Hampshire and the IOW are ideally suited because it has both urban and rural areas with
a rich mixture of licensed premises. We run the start up to: ensure that transition from
local authority to SIA licences was seamless; to minimise disruption to door supervisors,
employers and the industry; to rigorously test technology and application process; and to
assess levels of training and competency skills.
Q. Local authority licences have worked well in the past. Why change them?
A. The standard of local authority schemes varies across the country – some good, some not
so good, some not at all. Some of the very best local authority schemes have difficulties -
monitoring training standards, updating & checking criminality, and suspending/revoking
licences. The SIA is transforming the security industry, taking it from a largely unregulated
business and making it legitimate right across the board. An SIA national licence is a
symbol of quality and competency that the public can trust.
Q. Haven't a lot of door supervisors criticised the SIA licensing scheme?
A. There are door supervisors that are very pleased with the new licensing. It is also
important to remember that we have the overwhelming support of the industry – not a
single legitimate security business opposes what we are doing. They, like us, want
professional, well trained, qualified door staff working in pubs and clubs, and most
importantly so do the public. There are many benefits for SIA licensed door supervisors
and door supervisor managers. The SIA licence is a national licence that cuts across all
local authority boundaries allowing greater flexibility for individuals and employers; it's a
recognised symbol of skill and probity, it's a mark of trust.
Q. How can the SIA justify the cost of £190?
A. Firstly, the licence fee covers a three year period, and is a national licence where unlike a
local authority badge door supervisors can work anywhere in England & Wales without
having to pay for another licence / licences – which can considerably exceed £190.
The SIA is not here to make a profit – the SIA is here to transform the private security
industry and taking it from a largely unregulated business to one which is legitimate across
the board, ensuring the public feel confident and secure when they enter a pub / club with
trained qualified professionals who have been screened. The £190 fee covers; CRB
checks, administration of the licence process, communications, SIA infrastructure – offices
and staff, enforcement and compliance and research & development.
Q. How many door supervisors will be out of work because of your new licence?
A. There will be some who won't make the grade – we make no apology for weeding out the
rogues and amateurs – but people who don't qualify should not have been in the job in the
first place. The new generation of door staff will be trained to deal with the increased
demands of overseeing a modern pub or club on a busy Saturday night.
Training and increased professionalism can only be a good thing for the door supervisors
themselves, licensees and importantly the public.
Q. What will the SIA do if there are not enough licensed door supervisors after 4 June?
A. After 4 June it will be an offence to work as an unlicensed door supervisor or to provide
unlicensed door staff. A network of SIA investigators will work closely with partner
organisations such as the police, local authorities and the industry itself to ensure
compliance of the regulations and licensing. They, like us, want to see professional,
trained and qualified door staff working at pubs and clubs, and most importantly so do the
public. It will be the responsibility of licensed premises to ensure they meet the legal
requirements.
Q. Will you shut down pubs and clubs that are not using licensed door staff?
A. The SIA is not about shutting pubs and clubs. We are about making pubs, clubs and bars
safe environments for the public to enjoy. If a licensee chooses to employ unlicensed door
staff, he is putting his customers at risk as well as his licence.
Q. Who is responsible for enforcement
A. The SIA is responsible for enforcement of its legislation, and local authorities will be
responsible for enforcement of the Licensing Act 2003, which includes the mandatory
condition under section 21 that states that where the licensing authority attaches a
condition to the licence requiring door supervisors they must be licensed by the SIA.
It is not expected that local authorities will visit premises just to check that door
supervisors have SIA licences, however, they may discover problems during the course of
an inspection or visit under other legislation, for example the Licensing Act. Where
unlicensed door supervisors are found, the local authority can take action under the
Licensing Act, if appropriate, and they may also take action under the Private Security
Industry Act (PSIA) if they wish. Alternatively the authority may feel that action is not
appropriate and simply pass on information that they have discovered to the SIA.
Therefore development of an intelligence sharing protocol will be important and LACORS
will be involved in this.
Any costs to local authorities will be incurred under the Licensing Act regime and will
therefore theoretically be covered by this licence fee. There is no requirement for
authorities to take action under the PSIA and therefore no additional costs will be incurred.
The SIA has offered to support officers who wish to make a bid to utilise part of their
authority's allocated Crime and Disorder Partnership funding for initiatives surrounding
door supervisor licensing.
This principle equally applies to other enforcement partners (e.g. the Police).
Q. Why should local authorities amend their PELs?
A. The Licensing Act 2003 includes the mandatory condition under section 21 that states that
where the licensing authority attaches a condition to the licence requiring door supervisors
they must be licensed by the SIA.
During the transition period of current licensing schemes to the introduction of the
Licensing Act, LACORS has advised local authorities to amend their PELs to include this
condition. This will enable police and local authorities to target venue operators who
choose to ignore the law.
Q. Can the SIA prosecute?
A. Anyone can bring a private prosecution for a breach of one of the offences created by the
PSIA; this includes partner organisations such as police and local authorities. The SIA will
have its own prosecution capability and will be able to prosecute in its own right.
Q. When will you start enforcement?
A. From the 4 June 2004. We already have planned a programme of visits to licensed
premises by a team of SIA investigators, the police and local authorities.
Q. What are the penalties for working without an SIA licence?
A. Any individual who carries out the duties of a door supervisor in the Hampshire or IOW
vicinity after the 4
th
June is at risk of prosecution under the Private Security Industry act
2001, the penalties for this can be either:
• Summary conviction at a Magistrates Court – where the maximum penalty is 6 months
imprisonment and/or a fine up to £5000.
• Trial on indictment at the Crown Court – where the maximum penalty is 6 months
imprisonment and/or an unlimited fine.
If you receive a warning or caution for working without a valid SIA licence after the 4
th
June offence date, this may be taken into consideration in any subsequent licence
application. This could result in you not being considered to be a "fit and proper" person to
be licensed and your application rejected. Please note that as the £190 is a licence
application fee, it is not refundable in the event of the licence being rejected.
Q. Have there been any problems with processing and the CRB checks?
A. It takes 4-6 weeks to process a correctly completed application form and this includes the
CRB check. We have had some teething problems which have now been addressed. We
have made a commitment that everyone who meets the criteria and has submitted a valid
application by 7 May will receive a licence by 4 June.
Q. Have there been any problems with lost documents or the PO Box listed on the
application return envelopes?
A. All SIA printed envelopes have the correct postcode. Mail has been received correctly at
this address. There have been reports from less than 1% of applicants that they have had
a problem with the postal service resulting in lost documents or post being returned.
Q. Why is there a lack of information on overseas record checks?
A. Information relating to applicants who have spent time overseas has been available for
some time on our website and was also contained in the original A5 "Get Licensed"
booklet issued October 2003. The new A4 "Get Licensed" booklet was updated to contain
more detailed information on both this and relevant criminal convictions and was released
in February 2004 and distributed to all local authorities. The SIA was able to send
information directly to those who had asked to be included on our mailing list.
Q & A – TRAINING
Q. How could door supervisors in Hampshire complete their training in time, when
there has been insufficient courses?
A. Firstly, training has been available since January 2004. There has been ample time and
training capacity for all door supervisors within Hampshire. Despite widespread SIA, Local
Authority and Police communications together with trainers / colleges marketing their
courses, many courses were cancelled due to lack of interest e.g. Farnborough College
were forced to cancel no less than six flexible courses in February and March. Training in
this period would have left sufficient time to request / submit an SIA application. This lack
of interest did lead to additional training providers e.g. Isle of Wight College withdrawing
their planned training application, however this did not effect capacity as other trainers
were available both during and prior to this period, and have been prepared to arrange
further courses upon demand.
Q. Why is there a lack of choice in training providers e.g. the Isle of Wight, which
means it is difficult and expensive for door supervisors to get the training?
A. Across Hampshire and the Isle of Wight there are thirteen training providers that provide
the new Level 2 National Certificate, some of which are flexible and able to travel where
demand exists. As stated above, this figure would have increased if there had not been a
lack of interest from door supervisors. The lack of choice on the Isle of Wight is a direct
result of the lack of interest, as the local college cancelled its plans and offers from outside
trainers to provide courses on the island were initially rejected.
Q. Why have the SIA not taken into consideration the difficulties the training providers
have had with the new training regime, that have caused them to withdraw from the
market ?
A. Firstly, training providers have not withdrawn from the market due to difficulties with the
new training. As detailed above, some training providers cancelled courses or withdrew
plans to enter the market due to the lack of interest from door supervisors. Despite this,
there was still sufficient training capacity. There were some technical difficulties
experienced by some training providers e.g. Farnborough College at the beginning of
February. However, they were able to quickly resolve the difficulties, and continued to run
courses – unfortunately many of these were then cancelled due to lack of interest.
Q. Why have the SIA allowed training providers to charge different fees?
A. The SIA does not run training courses or give qualifications. The SIA endorses Awarding
Bodies – BII, City & Guilds and NCFE who offer the qualifications and approve the
trainers. The SIA cannot dictate the cost of training or promote any specific training
provider. The SIA has listed the contact numbers of all trainers that provide the new Level
2 National Certificate, in order for door supervisors to find the best available course.
Q. Why are the training fees so high?
A. The cost of training can range from £140 to £350, and the contact numbers of trainers are
available in order for door supervisors to find the best available deal. The SIA have
obtained funding support from the Learning and Skills Council who offset training costs by
£102 per person for those door supervisors who do the full training. The SIA booklet /
website also contains details of qualifications which provide an exemption. The new
qualification is recognised nationally and covers the role and responsibilities of a door
supervisor and communication and conflict management – skills that ensure the public feel
safe and secure with qualified professionals.
Q. Are the SIA aware of the delays in the examination process caused by the NCFE,
which means applications cannot be returned in time for door supervisors to work
on 4
th
June?
A. For the management of training for the SIA licensing, three awarding bodies (BII, City and
Guilds and NCFE) are working together as a consortium, each with their own clearly
defined responsibilities to ensure effective delivery of the approved training course. It is
correct that NCFE approved training providers are required to send their completed
examinations to BIIAB for marking, these are then in turn returned back to NCFE, the
college and then back to the candidate. The SIA has been closely monitoring examination
return times, which has ranged from 4 to 14 days. We have been communicating with all
stakeholders for many months, informing them of training requirements / dates to
complete training and apply, urging companies and door supervisors not to leave it to the
last minute. Training has been available, and only those who have left it to the last minute
are affected by the examination process time. Applicants do not have to wait for their
certificate, the reference number is all that is needed and this can be obtained from the
trainer once the exam result is known.
Q & A – Name on SIA Licence
Q. Why did the SIA decide to have names on SIA licenses if they knew it was a
controversial move?
A. We recognise that some security staff will be concerned about the having their name on
the front of the licence card. But the SIA is accountable to Government and the public, to
carry out its statutory functions, including the purpose of protecting the public. The
inclusion of the name improves the accountability of security operatives to the public and
the SIA.
Q. Why can't licences have a number on the front and the door supervisor's name on
the reverse?
A. We considered that approach. However, both the name and the licence number are
required to appear in the Register of Licence Holders, which is open to the public. This is
required under the legislation. The public will not be able to use the Register fully if they
cannot check a licence on the name or the licence number.
Q. The police are identified by a number why should door supervisors put themselves
at risk by displaying their name?
A. This is debatable. The Police are historically identified by their number. However,
increasingly, as a public service, they are identified by name badges as well.
Q. Isn't it more difficult to read a name from a distance, especially a foreign name,
rather than a series of numbers or letters and numbers?
A. It may be and we have given prominence to the number in the space provided on the
licence. For the reasons given above we consider it appropriate to include the name on
the licence.
Q. What will happen if a door supervisor wears his licence with the photo and name
turned to their chest?
A. The conditions of the licence state that the card should be displayed, and must not be
defaced. The licence number and name do not appear on the reverse. If someone turns
their licence around it cannot be confirmed that they are licensed staff and they are in
breach of the licence conditions. Contravention of the licence conditions is a criminal
offence under section 9(4) of the PSIA.
Q. What information about door supervisors' licences will be available on the SIA
website?
A. The register of licence holders will contain information on the licences held by each
licensed individual. It will contain:
•
First name, middle initial, surname.
•
Date or birth
•
licence number
•
Licence sector (e.g. door supervisor) for which the individual is licensed.
•
Role (e.g. frontline operative)
An individual's addresses will not appear on the public register.
Q. Will anyone be able to access that information?
A. It will be a public register.
Q. Won't this move alienate door supervisors when the SIA is trying to encourage
them to take training and to get licensed?
A. It is important that everyone employed in the different sectors of the private security
industry understands that it is an essential part of the SIA's role to continue to drive up
standards and to increase accountability and public confidence in the regulation of the
industry. This applies to all sectors of the industry. Door supervisors are simply the first
sector for which regulation has been introduced.
Q. Local Authority registration does not require the inclusion of my name. Why doesn't
the SIA learn from them?
A. Your Local Authority may not include the name on the licence but some do. Our research
has shown that whilst Local Authorities recognises your concerns, many consider that the
inclusion of the name is in the best interests of the regulation of the industry. In the
majority of cases the Local Authority registration schemes are not required by law. The
PSIA introduces standards for England and Wales, making registration and the display of
names a legal requirement. We understand this approach may result in criticism from
people employed in the industry but making door supervisors more accountable will
improve public confidence and will be in the interests of driving up standards and
customer service.
Q. By putting my name on the licence card I can be traced to my home address, and
you are putting my personal safety at risk
A. The only detail that we are making public, as required by the register, and as it appears on
the licence card, is your name. Your address does not appear on the card or the SIA
register. Someone would not be able to trace your address solely from SIA public
information. Tracing may occur if someone was able to identify your home address from
the telephone directory, or the council tax register. If you are concerned about that
possibility you should contact the owners of those directories to arrange for your name
and address to be removed from the public directory. We cannot do this as far as the SIA
register is concerned because it is required by law.
Q. I've already been trained as a door supervisor as part of my local registration
scheme. Is that enough?
A. Many door supervisors will have completed training courses and hold a qualification.
Some of these qualifications will exempt door supervisors from further training and
qualifications. Not all local training schemes are to the same standard as that required for
an SIA licence. However, as a minimum, the holder of a currently valid local authority or
police registration badge is exempt from some of the training but none of the assessment.
Even if you are fully exempt from the new SIA approved training or qualification, you will
need to exchange your current certificate for the new one called "Level 2 National
Certificate for Door Supervisors" before applying for your SIA licence.
Q. Do I need a licence to work as an event steward?
A. Most people working as event stewards may perform only safety activities that are not
licensable under the Private Security Industry Act 2001.
However, those working at events undertaking licensable activity will require an SIA
licence. Licensable activity is defined as...
•
Guarding premises against unauthorised access or occupation, outbreaks of disorder
or damage
•
Guarding property against destruction, damage or theft
•
Guarding one or more individuals against assault or injury
If anyone undertaking licensable activity works at a premises or area within the
arena/stadium/venue holding a Justices on-licence under the 1964 Licensing Act, they will
require an SIA door supervisor licence. Those working at events or premises with the
following type of licences...
•
Occasional licences, within the meaning of the Licensing Act 1964
•
Licences under the Private Places of Entertainment (Licensing) Act 1967
•
Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1982
•
London Government Act 1963
will also require a door supervisor licence in the future.
If anyone undertakes licensable activity under a contract for supply of services at a
premises or area within the arena/stadium/venue not licensed under the 1964 Licensing
Act or other provisions shown above, they will require an SIA security guard licence when
licensing for this sector of the private security industry is in force. This is currently
projected to start in 2005. Those providing security services at events working on a wholly
voluntary basis will not require an SIA licence. A volunteer must not receive any reward,
benefit or payment in kind.
|
Written on 5:48 PM by CommuniKation
Introduction
The Private Security Industry Act 20011 provides for the licensing, by the Security Industry
Authority (SIA), of a number of activities in the private security industry.
The Act also provides for the establishment of the SIA, as a non-departmental public body,
to be the regulating authority.
As of 1 November 2007, our remit also extends to Scotland.
Licensable Activities
The PSIA provides for the regulation of a number of sectors in the private security industry.
It provides a framework of controls, including the licensing of all individuals engaging in
licensable activity in five industry sectors: vehicle immobilisers (wheel-clampers), security
guards (incorporating door supervisors, CCTV, CVIT, close protection), key holders,
security consultants and private investigators.
Since the passage of the Act, the SIA has had plans and criteria regulation and the issue of
licences approved by the Home Office Minister. More detailed information and criteria are
available on the SIA website (www.the-sia.org.uk) about:
• the form of the licensing scheme;
• the cost of a licence;
• the training requirements, including criteria for trainers;
• the criteria for granting, refusing, suspending or revoking licences;
• the application process; and
• the dates on which different industry sectors will be designated for regulation under
the Act.
Section 3(2) of the Act defines a person as being licensable if employed or supplied on
contract, to carry out front line or non-front line licensable activities. All contract security
activities defined are licensable by the SIA and in-house security guard activities on
licensed premises2 (defined by the act as door supervisors) are also licensable by the SIA.
The SIA publishes the criteria it uses to decide whether to grant a licence to applicants.
Applicants must pass an identity check, a criminal record check and undergo approved
training if they will be working in a 'front-line' activity, and must satisfy other fit and proper
person criteria such as demonstrating the right to live and work in the UK and a mental
health declaration.
1
Also referred to as the Act or PSIA.
2
Defined by The Act, Schedule 2, part 2, 8 (2) as premises licensed for the sale of alcohol
or provision of regulated entertainment
Page 3 of 5
Paragraph 2(4) to (6) of Schedule 2 excludes certain persons from the scope of security3
guarding activities and as such do not need to apply for an exemption;
• people who only control access to a premises to the extent of securing that persons
have paid for admission or have invitations or passes to enter;
• people who do not perform those activities otherwise than incidentally to maintain
order or discipline amongst a group they are working with; or
• those persons who do not wholly or mainly perform those activities and who
incidentally respond to a sudden or unexpected occurrence,
• volunteers, unless they receive payment in kind or reward are not licensable. The
principles of what constitutes payment in kind or reward are in line with those set
out by the Inland Revenue. In short the IR identifies a payment in kind or benefit as
whether it is subject to either PAYE (Tax) or National Insurance Contributions. The
list provided on the IR website (link below) is comprehensive, but not prescriptive,
and if in doubt individuals or organisations should consult the SIA.
http://www.inlandrevenue.gov.uk/employers/ebik/ebik2/table-of-contents.htm
The Government's Better Regulation Agenda
The SIA is committed to the principles of the Government's Better Regulation agenda and
therefore does not intend the scope of the PSIA to include elements of the private security
industry where suitable alternative arrangements already apply thereby securing the safety
of the public. The SIA does not wish to see an exemption route that is burdensome, costly
or confusing for businesses.
Exemption from Licensable Activities
Section 4(1) of the Act provides for the Secretary of State (SoS) to make regulations to
prescribe circumstances in which persons will be exempt from the requirement to have a
licence to undertake licensable conduct. The SoS can only do this where the SoS is
satisfied that there are circumstances in which activities of licensable conduct are
undertaken by people to whom "suitable alternative arrangements" will apply and the SoS
is satisfied that "as a consequence" it is unnecessary for people undertaking those activities
to be required to be licensed.
The SoS and Ministers have approved the use of the SIA Exemption Strategy as a
framework for defining such 'prescribed circumstances'. The SIA will use this framework
and the following tests in its consideration of all exemption requests and recommendations
to the Home Office Minister responsible.
The phrase "suitable alternative arrangements" in section 4 is defined in section 4(3) as
arrangements that the SoS or, as the case may be, the SIA are satisfied are "equivalent, for
all practical purposes so far as the protection of the public is concerned, to those applying
to persons applying for and granted licences."
There are two key points arising from this test. Firstly, that the test is on equivalence, and
not on whether the arrangements are identical. Secondly, the equivalence has to be judged
by reference to one particular consideration – 'the protection of the public'.
3
The Act describes the activities of 'manned' guarding. In order to better reflect the make
up of the sector, the SIA uses the term 'security guard' or 'security guarding' to the same
effect.
Page 4 of 5
The test of equivalence involves an element of comparison. In discussions about a
framework for exemptions the Minister and Home Office have confirmed they consider that
the alternative arrangements have to be compared with the arrangements that are in use by
the SIA for those applying for licences. That requires an examination of the arrangements
applicable to those who are the nearest comparators to the group in question.
Exemption Tests
Section 4 of the Act provides a clear test and threshold that suitable alternative
arrangements are or will be in place. Applications for exemptions must be considered in
light of this and the Government's Better Regulation agenda. Under current licensing
criteria, Home Office Ministers have approved that the following or equivalent should be in
place:
a) trained to a nationally accredited standard and that this training should cover
conflict management for security guards;
b) subject to suitable vetting; and
c) suitably regulated and monitored.
Exemption Request Process
An exemption request proposal should be made via a Government department or existing
regulatory body or body that would retain oversight of the exemption prescribed
circumstances, to the SIA. The SIA will not accept exemption requests from individuals, or
from corporate entities with no regulatory functions.
The proposal should address each of the following exemption tests / requirements (Annex
A).
The SIA will discuss the exemption with the body requesting the exemption and compare it
with the criteria that are already in use and submit both the application for exemption, and
their recommendation to Home Office Ministers.
Home Office Ministers will consider the exemption request proposal and the SIA
recommendation, acknowledging their own discretion to make determinations within the
constraints of the legislation, and determine the granting of an exemption (including
prescribed circumstances) or not.
For Further Advice
For further advice or to discuss / present a submission please contact:
Assistant Director Government & Legal
Security Industry Authority
PO Box 49768
90 High Holborn
London
WCIV 6WY
Tel. 020 7025 4100
Fax. 020 7025 4101
Email. exemptions@the-sia.org.uk
Page 5 of 5
Is the Activity Licensable?
Define the activity, its licensable status and its comparable SIA sector (see above).
What are the Suitable Alternative Arrangements?
Define all alternative arrangements, which at a minimum must include the areas detailed
above.
Small Firms Impact Test
Assess and define whether the proposals outlined in the exemption request have any
significant effect on small businesses.
Competition Assessment
Assess and define how the proposals outlined in the exemption request will apply to a
range of businesses and individuals, assisting them in their activities, and the effect, if any,
on market share or entry to the market.
Monitoring, Compliance and Sanctions
Define how the monitoring, compliance and sanctions activities proposed within the
exemption request are in place. Define how the Government department or existing
regulatory body or body that retains oversight will report regularly to Ministers and SIA on
how the exemption is operating.
Implementation and Delivery Plan
Define how arrangements will be put in place to ensure that the exemption request
proposal will be delivered and well communicated to those it affects.
|
Written on 2:51 PM by CommuniKation
Agriculture
Aurat Publication & Information Service Foundation
Email address is apisf@brain.net.pk
Main Office in Lahore, Punjab.
[The Societies Registration Act, 1860]
Community Uplift Program - CUP
Email address is cup@apollo.net.pk
Main Office in Islamabad, Capital.
[The Companies Ordinance, 1984 ( Non-Profit Company; Section 42)]
Green Circle Organization - GCO
Home site URL is http://www.greencircle.free-online.co.uk
Email address is habibs@brain.net.pk
Main Office in Lahore, Punjab.
[The Voluntary Social Welfare Agency]
Health and Nutrition Development Society - HANDS
Email address is hands@digicom.net.pk
Main Office in Karachi, Sindh.
[The Societies Registration Act, 1860]
Institute of Policy Studies - IPS
Home site URL is http://www.ips.org.pk
Email address is info@ips.org.pk
Main Office in Islamabad, Punjab.
[The Companies Ordinance, 1984 ( Non-Profit Company; Section 42)]
Business
Faran Education Society - FES
Email address is reazfes@cyber.net.pk
Main Office in Karachi, Sindh.
[The Societies Registration Act, 1860]
Gul Bahao
Email address is nadir501@pienet.net
Main Office in Karachi, Sindh.
[The Trust Act, 1882]
Pakistan Coconut&oil Palm Plantation Society - PCOPS
Email address is pcops@net-ngo.com
[The Societies Registration Act, 1860]
SAHIL
Home site URL is http://www.sahil.org
Email address is info@sahil.org
Main Office in Islamabad, Punjab.
[The Voluntary Social Welfare Agency]
Pakistan Press Foundation - PPF
Home site URL is http://www.oneworld.org/ppf
Email address is owais.ali@attglobal.net
Main Office in Karachi, Sindh.
[The Societies Registration Act, 1860]
Children
Catholic Social Services - CSS
Email address is csskhi@khi.comsats.net.pk
Main Office in Karachi, Sindh.
[The Voluntary Social Welfare Agency]
Child Care Foundation - CCF
Email address is ccf@nexlinx.net.pk
Main Office in Lahore Cantt, Punjab.
[The Societies Registration Act, 1860]
Basic Urban Services for Katchi Abadis - BUSTI
Email address is busti71@hotmail.com busti@cyber.net.pk
Main Office in Karachi, Sindh.
[The Societies Registration Act, 1860]
Citizens Commission for Human Development - CCHD
Main Office in Lahore, Punjab.
[The Voluntary Social Welfare Agency]
Education, Arts, Science and Environment Welfare society - EASE
Email address is aazmi@super.net.pk
Main Office in Karachi, Sindh.
[The Voluntary Social Welfare Agency]
Development
Association for Social Development - ASD
Home site URL is http://www.asd.com.pk
Email address is asd@isb.paknet.com.pk
Main Office in Islamabad, Capital.
[The Voluntary Social Welfare Agency]
Basic Urban Services for Katchi Abadis - BUSTI
Email address is busti71@hotmail.com busti@cyber.net.pk
Main Office in Karachi, Sindh.
[The Societies Registration Act, 1860]
Education, Arts, Science and Environment Welfare society - EASE
Email address is aazmi@super.net.pk
Main Office in Karachi, Sindh.
The Voluntary Social Welfare Agency]
Human Rights Group of Pakistan - HRGP
Email address is hrg.pak@post.com
Main Office in Karachi, Sindh.
[The Trust Act, 1882]
Media Foundation
Email address is mediafd@wol.net.pk
Main Office in Lahore, Punjab.
[The Societies Registration Act, 1860]
Education
Aahung
Email address is krhp@cyber.net.pk
Main Office in Karachi, Sindh.
[The Voluntary Social Welfare Agency]
Aasthan Latif Welfare Society - ALAST
Home site URL is http://www.alast.atfreeweb.com
Email address is alast@mail.com
Main Office in Karachi, Sindh.
[The Voluntary Social Welfare Agency]
Al-Noor Foundation - ANF
Home site URL is http://www.alnoor.netfirms.org
Email address is anfpk@hotmail.com
Main Office in Islamabad, Capital.
[The Voluntary Social Welfare Agency]
AMAL Human Development Network - AMAL
Home site URL is http://www.amal-hdn.org
Email address is amal_hdn@yahoo.com
Main Office in Islamabad, Capital.
[The Societies Registration Act, 1860]
Association for Network for Community Empowerment - ACNE
Email address is rajaabas@yahoo.com
Main Office in Lahore, Punjab.
[The Voluntary Social Welfare Agency]
Environment
Anjuman Falah-e-Insaniat Sargodha - AFI
Email address is afi_sargodha@hotmail.com
Main Office in Sargodha, Punjab.
[The Voluntary Social Welfare Agency]
Association for Network for Community Empowerment - ACNE
Email address is rajaabas@yahoo.com
Main Office in Lahore, Punjab.
[The Voluntary Social Welfare Agency]
Chaudhry Ahmad Khan Bakhar Shaheed Memorail Welfare Trust International
Email address is chaudhry_trust@yahoo.com
Main Office in Islamabad, Capital.
[The Trust Act, 1882]
Ever Green Organization
Email address is egogilgit@hotmail.com
Main Office in ISLAMABAD, Capital.
[The Voluntary Social Welfare Agency]
Family Planning Association of Pakistan - FPAP
Home site URL is http://www.brain.net.pk/~fpapak
Email address is fpapak@brain.net.pk
Main Office in Lahore, Punjab.
[The Voluntary Social Welfare Agency]
Health
ACELP
Email address is acelpicd@yahoo.com
Main Office in Karachi, Sindh.
[The Voluntary Social Welfare Agency]
Agha Khan Health Services, Pakistan - AKHSP
Email address is akhspho@cyber.net.pk
Main Office in Karachi, Sindh.
[The Companies Ordinance, 1984 ( Non-Profit Company; Section 42)]
Association for Network for Community Empowerment - ACNE
Email address is rajaabas@yahoo.com
Main Office in Lahore, Punjab.
[The Voluntary Social Welfare Agency]
Association for Rational Use of Medication in Pakistan - The Network
Email address is arump@best.net.pk
Main Office in Islamabad, Capital.
[The Companies Ordinance, 1984 ( Non-Profit Company; Section 42)]
Azad Foundation
Home site URL is http://www.azadfoundation.org
Email address is azadfoundation@hotmail.com
Main Office in Karachi, Sindh.
[The Societies Registration Act, 1860]
Human Rights
Aahung
Email address is krhp@cyber.net.pk
Main Office in Karachi, Sindh.
[The Voluntary Social Welfare Agency]
All Pakistan Women Association - APWA
Email address is apwa48@hotmail.com
Main Office in Karachi, Sindh .
[The Voluntary Social Welfare Agency]
Al-Noor Foundation - ANF
Home site URL is http://www.alnoor.netfirms.org
Email address is anfpk@hotmail.com
Main Office in Islamabad, Capital.
[The Voluntary Social Welfare Agency]
AMAL Human Development Network - AMAL
Home site URL is http://www.amal-hdn.org
Email address is amal_hdn@yahoo.com
Main Office in Islamabad, Capital.
[The Societies Registration Act, 1860]
|
